Please login or register. May 23, 2013, 05:20:10 PM

Author Topic: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit  (Read 1467 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*Estranged*

  • All Geared Up
  • *****
  • Posts: 9821
  • Gender: Male
  • Official First Member of the Prostitutes Union.
Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit

A judge is set to toss one claim but keep another in ongoing case involving the Guns N' Roses singer's heartache when he saw Slash featured on the game cover.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/axl-rose-guitar-hero-lawsuit-361946

On Tuesday, a hearing was held in a Los Angeles courtroom concerning a $20 million lawsuit brought by Axl Rose against Activision Blizzard for featuring former Guns N' Roses band-mate Slash in Guitar Hero III. By the end of the hearing, the judge indicated that he was going to toss Rose's fraud claim but allow his breach-of-contract claim to continue, setting up a potential trial next February.
Rose's attorney Skip Miller promises it will be a "very interesting" affair.
In the suit, Rose and his Black Frog Music claimed that the video game publisher fraudulently induced him into authorizing "Welcome to the Jungle" for use in the popular game by telling him during negotiations that it wouldn't feature any reference to Slash, the guitarist with whom he has been famously feuding for years.
One of the big problems for Rose has been that the game was released on Oct. 28, 2007. The front cover of Guitar Hero III featured Slash in one of his classic poses. And yet, Rose's lawsuit wasn't filed until late November 2010 — more than three years after Rose's agent sent Activision an e-mail objecting. Activision's lawyers pointed out that Rose knew about the objectionable material for quite some time yet didn't file soon enough to be within the statute of limitations.
Why did Rose wait? In his own words...
"The reason I did not file a lawsuit is because Activision -- through my managers and representatives -- offered me a separate video game and other business proposals worth millions of dollars to resolve and settle my claims relating to GHIII," said the GnR' frontman in a deposition. "From December 2007 through November 2010, Activision was offering me a Guns N' Roses dedicated video game, a game dedicated to music from the 'Chinese Democracy' album, and other proposals."
Such possibilities will be of interest to GnR fans, but they might not make for good legal reasoning. Officially, Rose's lawyer attempted to argue that his claims did not accrue until he discovered that "Activision had been intentionally concealing its plans to use [Velvet Revolver] and Slash in the game all along."
But the judge isn't accepting that argument and appears ready to strike the fraud claim because the statute of limitations had expired.
The lawsuit came close to being tossed altogether over Activision's objection to Rose's breach of contract claim.
GNR Music, which administers publishing rights to the band's songs, licensed Activision to use the big "Jungle" hit. In a series of e-mails sent to Activision after a written synch license was executed, Rose's reps objected to Slash's image being used as an "avatar." Activision went ahead with the game anyway.
In the case, Activision argues that its agreement was with GNR Music, and that "Rose had no authority to enter into a license for 'Welcome to the Jungle' in his individual capacity because he does not own the song or the sound recording."
Activision says Rose himself confirmed this by saying, "Unanimous approval by all three partners of GNR Music is required before any license to use Guns N' Roses music is given."
The synch license was signed on the band's behalf by Wayne Milligan, a licensing administrator at Sussman & Associates. Milligan does work for GNR Music, but it has been Rose's contention that Milligan was also acting as his own personal agent.
Activision attempted to argue this was irrelevant, that there could be no breach of contract because Rose himself didn't have the authority to unilaterally make a deal.
But the judge is primed to allow Rose's breach of contract allegations to be settled at a trial, which is now scheduled for Feb. 1, 2013.
Miller says he's satisfied with the result, that the "damages and harm will be the same with a lower burden of proof" now that he doesn't need to show fraudulent concealment.
David Steinberg, the attorney at Mitchell Silberberg representing Activision, couldn't be reached for comment.

I am, smelling like a rose that somebody gave me on my birthday deathbed. I am, smelling like a rose that somebody gave me cause I'm dead and bloated.

slashthe2nd

  • All Geared Up
  • *****
  • Posts: 8128
  • Gender: Male
  • The time has come to throw your halo down
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2012, 09:51:16 AM »
ah damm,if only axl accepted those offers of a GnR game(at that time)i'd be ecstatic, but i just dont dont care about GH anymore
MUFC:DEFENDING TITLES
   LFC:DEFENDING RACISM

hairy-balls

  • Beatin' A Dead Horse
  • **
  • Posts: 193
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2012, 01:00:26 PM »
Rose himself confirmed this by saying, "Unanimous approval by all three partners of GNR Music is required before any license to use Guns N' Roses music is given."
I'm assuming Axl is one of those 3, who are the other ones?

kapoink

  • Beatin' A Dead Horse
  • **
  • Posts: 195
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2012, 09:41:56 PM »
I'm assuming Axl is one of those 3, who are the other ones?
what do you think ?? not so hard ....

hairy-balls

  • Beatin' A Dead Horse
  • **
  • Posts: 193
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2012, 11:44:59 PM »
and they would be?

abaraxas

  • Very Old At Heart
  • ******
  • Posts: 16760
  • Arch Faggot
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2012, 06:22:02 AM »
Ferdinand and the Nanny, durr  :rolleyes:
Humanary Stew

hairy-balls

  • Beatin' A Dead Horse
  • **
  • Posts: 193
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2012, 01:59:00 PM »
honestly?

Exitus

  • But A Little Wouldn't Do It
  • ****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Gender: Male
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #7 on: August 17, 2012, 04:42:11 PM »
and they would be?

Duff n' Slash.

Izzy obviously tries to keep away from serious business stuff. Adler has sold/lost his rights (as far as I know).

hairy-balls

  • Beatin' A Dead Horse
  • **
  • Posts: 193
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #8 on: August 17, 2012, 04:50:45 PM »
I thought Slash and Duff had signed their rights away (and Izzy too for that matter) and yeah I knew Steven lost his rights.

Exitus

  • But A Little Wouldn't Do It
  • ****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Gender: Male
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #9 on: August 17, 2012, 04:57:58 PM »
As far as I know, it's Axl and Slash and Duff who have something to say about the old GNR stuff. I remember it was them who went against Geffen and their "Greatest hits" album (although they didn't succeed).

*Estranged*

  • All Geared Up
  • *****
  • Posts: 9821
  • Gender: Male
  • Official First Member of the Prostitutes Union.
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #10 on: August 17, 2012, 09:19:31 PM »
I thought Slash and Duff had signed their rights away (and Izzy too for that matter) and yeah I knew Steven lost his rights.

they only signed over the name of the band, nothing has changed as far as copy rights to whatever has been written. Axl owns the name but not music
I am, smelling like a rose that somebody gave me on my birthday deathbed. I am, smelling like a rose that somebody gave me cause I'm dead and bloated.

adler

  • Won't Be Told Anymore
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #11 on: August 19, 2012, 10:45:46 AM »
Totally Axl has no  right after agreeing. Just agreement regret fuckee

GnFnRosesfan#1

  • Bad Obsession
  • ***
  • Posts: 750
  • Gender: Male
    • myspace
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #12 on: August 19, 2012, 04:06:58 PM »
Since we are on the topic, as far as I know everything recorded by the original band is no longer considered guns n roses as far as copyrights go. It is w. Axl rose, saul hudson, jeffery stradlin and so on.
"Their are four kinds of people in this world those with common sence, those with book smarts, those with both, and those with neither, which one are you?"--- MikeyJ

ALLLOCKEDUPINSIDE

  • Bad Obsession
  • ***
  • Posts: 887
  • My opinion is better than yours
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #13 on: August 20, 2012, 11:27:07 PM »
ah damm,if only axl accepted those offers of a GnR game(at that time)i'd be ecstatic, but i just dont dont care about GH anymore

Guitar Hero went under years ago, they no longer make them.

Exitus

  • But A Little Wouldn't Do It
  • ****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Gender: Male
Re: Axl Rose Gets Mixed Result at Hearing in 'Guitar Hero' Lawsuit
« Reply #14 on: August 21, 2012, 08:54:16 AM »
Honestly though, if you think about a game called "Guitar Hero", who would you expect to see on the cover?
Axl or Slash?  :?: