Please login or register. May 24, 2013, 07:29:27 PM

Author Topic: Bad show review  (Read 2270 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

fuckethead

  • Beatin' A Dead Horse
  • **
  • Posts: 174
Bad show review
« on: February 27, 2012, 05:30:55 PM »
I thought this was at least a entertaining read, and you have to post the good with the bad.

http://www.metalsludge.tv/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2715&Itemid=40

This just makes me even more excited to see what will happen in April
Fit to burn...

Johan!

  • NewGNR Crew!
  • Gets More Pussy Than Mick Wall
  • *****
  • Posts: 6681
  • Gender: Male
  • 01011001
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2012, 06:21:41 PM »
His main bashing point is that the show was long?  :lol:

Oh and he seems to think the current band was put together last week.

fuckethead

  • Beatin' A Dead Horse
  • **
  • Posts: 174
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2012, 07:04:55 PM »
To me, I kinda seems like he is saying the band is just calling the performance in. Which...makes sense. I mean Richard is in how many other bands? He was on tour with Thin Lizzy just a few months ago. So does that make him any more or less a part of these bands then GNR. DJ is a slash clone....no one can deny that. Does a great job but I mean top hat, smoke les paul... and IN GUNS N ROSES. Its a little to ironic. He goes on to say some good things about AXL and well deserved. Axl is trying to make this a band and sell its as GNR. We all no its not and its starting to become painfully obvious to people that you cant buy or fake heart. These guys have nothing invested in any of the old songs other then a fat pay check. And the new stuff, what are they doing 4 songs a night! Out of a 3 hour concert. The guys in the band are excited to say they are in GNR and I am sure they love the big gigs and the travel around the world, but I mean its starting to show that the intensity and drive that made GNR was what made the band special. The songs were and are great, any body can play them, but you cant sell it if you are just a hired guy. That's what this guy is talking about and I have to agree with him.

P.S - The line about Frank was bang on....he plays the songs very poorly. Who let him in the band in the first place. 
Fit to burn...

axlroethlisberger7

  • In Another Woman's Bed
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2012, 07:55:51 PM »
already read it.I was there and this review is total bullshit and many others have also said the same.Great show

hydereznor

  • Realtime Visionary
  • **
  • Posts: 113
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2012, 08:04:25 PM »
To me, I kinda seems like he is saying the band is just calling the performance in. Which...makes sense. I mean Richard is in how many other bands? He was on tour with Thin Lizzy just a few months ago. So does that make him any more or less a part of these bands then GNR. DJ is a slash clone....no one can deny that. Does a great job but I mean top hat, smoke les paul... and IN GUNS N ROSES. Its a little to ironic. He goes on to say some good things about AXL and well deserved. Axl is trying to make this a band and sell its as GNR. We all no its not and its starting to become painfully obvious to people that you cant buy or fake heart. These guys have nothing invested in any of the old songs other then a fat pay check. And the new stuff, what are they doing 4 songs a night! Out of a 3 hour concert. The guys in the band are excited to say they are in GNR and I am sure they love the big gigs and the travel around the world, but I mean its starting to show that the intensity and drive that made GNR was what made the band special. The songs were and are great, any body can play them, but you cant sell it if you are just a hired guy. That's what this guy is talking about and I have to agree with him.
Maybe you should be quite for a little while.. Take a nap, calm down, a look at the band with a little more intelligence.

P.S - The line about Frank was bang on....he plays the songs very poorly. Who let him in the band in the first place. 
Slash sucks. Bumblefoot is god

cgrep

  • Bedouin
  • **
  • Posts: 76
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2012, 11:06:07 PM »
I totally disagree. I think this is the best version of gnr. I can't wait for them to come. Ack to Orlando.  It was badass in the arena. I can only imagine the house of blues will totally kick ass.

insides

  • Catcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2012, 11:40:24 PM »
I totally disagree. I think this is the best version of gnr. I can't wait for them to come. Ack to Orlando.  It was badass in the arena. I can only imagine the house of blues will totally kick ass.

to me the best version of gnr post slash was axl rose, robin finck, buckethead, tommy stinson, richard fortus, dizzy reed, chriss pittman, and brain

GnFnRosesfan#1

  • Bad Obsession
  • ***
  • Posts: 750
  • Gender: Male
    • myspace
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2012, 11:55:19 PM »
to me the best version of gnr post slash was axl rose, robin finck, buckethead, tommy stinson, richard fortus, dizzy reed, chriss pittman, and brain

You mean the band that was a collection of creeps and weirdos? They had one severly awful tour, and you think they were the best? I agree that buckethead is extremly talented, but the best version of gnt they were not!!! In fact I think they were the worst. They had one good performance at rock in rio, but not enough to warrant such credit.
"Their are four kinds of people in this world those with common sence, those with book smarts, those with both, and those with neither, which one are you?"--- MikeyJ

insides

  • Catcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2012, 12:02:46 AM »
You mean the band that was a collection of creeps and weirdos? They had one severly awful tour, and you think they were the best? I agree that buckethead is extremly talented, but the best version of gnt they were not!!! In fact I think they were the worst. They had one good performance at rock in rio, but not enough to warrant such credit.

they had a good performance at MTV VMA 2002 too

GnFnRosesfan#1

  • Bad Obsession
  • ***
  • Posts: 750
  • Gender: Male
    • myspace
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2012, 12:17:41 AM »
That was a train wreck!!!
"Their are four kinds of people in this world those with common sence, those with book smarts, those with both, and those with neither, which one are you?"--- MikeyJ

insides

  • Catcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2012, 12:42:36 AM »
That was a train wreck!!!

how was it a train wreck?

GnR587

  • Won't Be Told Anymore
  • ***
  • Posts: 406
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2012, 01:48:25 AM »
how was it a train wreck?
it what universe was it NOT a train wreck? it was a horrible performance by Axl and fuckin' freaks! Buckethead, as good as he is, does not belong in GNR, Robin Fink was an gay porn star alien, and Axl had his Mickey Mouse vocals on during the dreadful performance. how is that NOT a train wreck?

insides

  • Catcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2012, 02:04:58 AM »
it what universe was it NOT a train wreck? it was a horrible performance by Axl and fuckin' freaks! Buckethead, as good as he is, does not belong in GNR, Robin Fink was an gay porn star alien, and Axl had his Mickey Mouse vocals on during the dreadful performance. how is that NOT a train wreck?

wow. i thought it was better than the mtv vma 92 performance

Randy Jesus

  • So The Little Got More And More
  • ****
  • Posts: 1751
  • The Jesus Christ of Sin & Vice
    • Guns N Roses Destruction
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2012, 02:06:36 AM »
Visually it was a train wreck in 2002, I will give that one to all you haters. Audio wise it wasnt.
RoseHudson/RandyJesus mod campaign 2013

If you vote for somebody else, "You're making as much sense as Adler after a drug cocktail!"

GnFnRosesfan#1

  • Bad Obsession
  • ***
  • Posts: 750
  • Gender: Male
    • myspace
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2012, 03:33:05 AM »
wow. i thought it was better than the mtv vma 92 performance



Are you crazy???? :hmpf
"Their are four kinds of people in this world those with common sence, those with book smarts, those with both, and those with neither, which one are you?"--- MikeyJ

insides

  • Catcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2012, 03:39:52 AM »



Are you crazy???? :hmpf

no. vma gnr mtv 2002 was high energy. killer. the band was tight. never looked or performed better!

shackler in the rye

  • Won't Be Told Anymore
  • ***
  • Posts: 479
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2012, 09:32:45 AM »
how was it a train wreck?

Would you like me to list the reasons? or write an essay? it was a train wreck alright, the only good thing about it was the madagascar part.
I remember vividly trying to convince myself that it wasn't as bad as it was......but then i just hear that shakey out of breath voice  :fpalm:

on the plus side they have come a VERY long way since.
It's not as if that's my Blood in the Water.. It's not as if my soul is free of despair

Catcher88

  • Realtime Visionary
  • ***
  • Posts: 667
  • Gender: Male
  • All men betray. All lose heart!
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2012, 10:19:51 AM »
To me, I kinda seems like he is saying the band is just calling the performance in. Which...makes sense. I mean Richard is in how many other bands? He was on tour with Thin Lizzy just a few months ago. So does that make him any more or less a part of these bands then GNR. DJ is a slash clone....no one can deny that. Does a great job but I mean top hat, smoke les paul... and IN GUNS N ROSES. Its a little to ironic. He goes on to say some good things about AXL and well deserved. Axl is trying to make this a band and sell its as GNR. We all no its not and its starting to become painfully obvious to people that you cant buy or fake heart. These guys have nothing invested in any of the old songs other then a fat pay check. And the new stuff, what are they doing 4 songs a night! Out of a 3 hour concert. The guys in the band are excited to say they are in GNR and I am sure they love the big gigs and the travel around the world, but I mean its starting to show that the intensity and drive that made GNR was what made the band special. The songs were and are great, any body can play them, but you cant sell it if you are just a hired guy. That's what this guy is talking about and I have to agree with him.

P.S - The line about Frank was bang on....he plays the songs very poorly. Who let him in the band in the first place. 

I'm sure most people would call it blasphemy and rape if they changed anything.

This review is just like what happened in Antwerp 2010: Everyone who went said it was great (on online forums, on the radio,...) but the reviews were all pretty bad. One reviewer actually aknowledged that by saying "it was worse, but you seemed to enjoy it"  :smirk:.

I can accept bad reviews but not if they're all about "this ain't the original band, so it sucks anyways"... Especially if you go back into the history of those magazines and discover they gave Appetite a worse review back than  :?: (which they offcourse had to ignore later on)!
If an album comes out, then buy it. If there's a concert you can go to, then go to it. You're not owed another record. You're not owed any inside stories. You're not owed the band to be managed by people you approve. It's just electronically recorded vibrations that you happen to like.

The Spaghetti Incident?

  • NewGNR Crew!
  • Very Old At Heart
  • *****
  • Posts: 16255
  • Gender: Male
  • All those wasted hours we used to know..
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #18 on: March 01, 2012, 10:41:04 AM »
You mean the band that was a collection of creeps and weirdos? They had one severly awful tour, and you think they were the best? I agree that buckethead is extremly talented, but the best version of gnt they were not!!! In fact I think they were the worst. They had one good performance at rock in rio, but not enough to warrant such credit.

The new songs played by that band sounded fantastic. The now tinkered with Chinese Democracy tracks aren't quite as .. good. The Blues and Madagascar are at the top of this list.

Robin should have played his parts the way he did at Rio on Chinese Democracy. Fucking beautiful.

GnFnRosesfan#1

  • Bad Obsession
  • ***
  • Posts: 750
  • Gender: Male
    • myspace
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #19 on: March 01, 2012, 11:07:05 PM »
The new songs played by that band sounded fantastic. The now tinkered with Chinese Democracy tracks aren't quite as .. good. The Blues and Madagascar are at the top of this list.

Robin should have played his parts the way he did at Rio on Chinese Democracy. Fucking beautiful.

I agree and disagree with that. Yes the blues and madagascar were better in rio than what ended up on the album, but thats it. Every other aong was vastly improved on the actual album, especially chinese democracy. The way the aongs were sounding, was for the most part kinda awful. They were too nin sounding and not emough gnr. I was actually quite suprised how rock n roll sounding cd ended up. I was afraid it was gonna be rob zombie, nin sounding but not as good, like orgy or powerman 5000  :yuk2: If axl didnt make those changes thats prolly how cd would have ended up and tham it would be a piece of dog shit!!!
« Last Edit: March 01, 2012, 11:08:56 PM by GnFnRosesfan#1 »
"Their are four kinds of people in this world those with common sence, those with book smarts, those with both, and those with neither, which one are you?"--- MikeyJ

insides

  • Catcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #20 on: March 02, 2012, 12:17:28 AM »
Would you like me to list the reasons? or write an essay? it was a train wreck alright, the only good thing about it was the madagascar part.
I remember vividly trying to convince myself that it wasn't as bad as it was......but then i just hear that shakey out of breath voice  :fpalm:

on the plus side they have come a VERY long way since.


the band was fantastic on that night

shackler in the rye

  • Won't Be Told Anymore
  • ***
  • Posts: 479
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #21 on: March 02, 2012, 12:35:01 AM »
the band was fantastic on that night

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oz4VqyQASI

the band sounded fine but on the Jungle and Paradise city parts axl sounded awful, anyone who disagree's click the link above
It's not as if that's my Blood in the Water.. It's not as if my soul is free of despair

shackler in the rye

  • Won't Be Told Anymore
  • ***
  • Posts: 479
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #22 on: March 02, 2012, 12:40:57 AM »
I do like how axl stares into the camera and shouts ROUND 1!!!!! though lol
It's not as if that's my Blood in the Water.. It's not as if my soul is free of despair

insides

  • Catcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #23 on: March 02, 2012, 12:49:35 AM »
I do like how axl stares into the camera and shouts ROUND 1!!!!! though lol

ROUND 1 meant the release of chinese in 2002

free schapelle corby

  • Realtime Visionary
  • **
  • Posts: 108
  • Gender: Male
  • schapelle out of the jungle please
"Welcome to prime-time bitch !" -F. Krueger

theshackler

  • A Stranger We Met
  • **
  • Posts: 34
Re: Bad show review
« Reply #25 on: April 01, 2012, 02:56:01 PM »
no. vma gnr mtv 2002 was high energy. killer. the band was tight. never looked or performed better!

I loved VMA 2002. They performed the best version of Madagascar by far.