If you chilled out and read everything I said in a more analitical way, you'd notice that I was only explaining my interpretation of events: 1# I helped you with your blog (how come I could do it and you dont understand instructions in your own language? dont call ME english-illiterate then) then you posted this thread with the same very intention as now. How ungrateful and backstabbing, yet I've never been offensive to you for ONE second in spite of your childish fucked up attitude.
you have a bad attitide indeed, instead of apologizing you acted like a little moron, you see? no wonder why you dont have friends
I'm fine, you're the one who got all pissy because I made a poll about this one, and you thought it was directed at you because you're fucking paranoid
I've never called you illiterate. I don't even know what that has to do with anything, but okay?
Seriously? Where are you getting that I'm out to get you or whatever?
I don't even know what got you started, I just seen where you told me got get fucked and I laughed. Why you're so angry, I'll never know
Calling me childish? Pot...kettle...
This is coming from someone who will bring up personal issues of other forum members to get the upper hand in a flame war, right....
Apparently, it seems as if I have more frineds then you do. At least on here. I know nothing about what life you have off of the internet, and I don't plan on it either.
and in reply to the tittle of thread, and I'm totally impartial, I'll say that
NO. you cant ban a member because he/she won the Most annoying member thread. If that were fair, half of the forum should've been banned long ago
however I can think of many reasons to ban, for instance, Dr. Jack Daniels (for insulting me deliberately when I'm not provoking and calling me a whore, retard, etc), Max Powers (same reasons as Dr. Jack Daniels and wishing publicly that the family of some users get cancer, etc)
I wish you could. No one has won a poll yet declaring them the most annoying member, so how could half of the forum be banned?