Please login or register. May 26, 2013, 08:38:14 AM

Author Topic: Hitman vs Undertaker  (Read 1773 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Euterpe

  • Very Old At Heart
  • ******
  • Posts: 18723
  • Gender: Female
  • Voice of the Voiceless.
Hitman vs Undertaker
« on: August 31, 2010, 03:00:42 AM »
 :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana
 :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana
 :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana
 :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana :banana



It's been 13 years since they've fought in a match, the first time in history on RAW.


I think my wrestling fan dream has come true. I feel like a little kid again :banana :bow:
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Fuck you, whore.

Johan is not nuts. At least not anymore nuts than the rest of us. He is ruled by his own psychology, which includes jealousy that he cannot sing that high.

better2112

  • Gets More Pussy Than Mick Wall
  • *****
  • Posts: 6916
  • Gender: Male
  • Heeeellllooooooooo!
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2010, 03:20:40 AM »
Will it really happen??
.......... poutine .......... I'M AWESOME .......... poutine .......... 

--FUCK the U.F.I!--

NewGNRnOldGNR

  • Man Of Wealth And Taste
  • *****
  • Posts: 5676
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2010, 03:31:15 AM »
The Bret Hart I knew was a legendary wrestler. The Bret Hart of today is simply awful. Hart's in-ring appearance is tragic, his acting is awful, and his wrestling, well I wouldn't even call it wrestling. Give up man, you're just ruining the "Hitman's" proud legacy with this pathetic gimmick.
BELFAST 31/08/2010
DUBLIN 17/05/2012

better2112

  • Gets More Pussy Than Mick Wall
  • *****
  • Posts: 6916
  • Gender: Male
  • Heeeellllooooooooo!
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2010, 03:36:33 AM »
first time I watch RAW in months... it's really gotten bad :fpalm:
.......... poutine .......... I'M AWESOME .......... poutine .......... 

--FUCK the U.F.I!--

Euterpe

  • Very Old At Heart
  • ******
  • Posts: 18723
  • Gender: Female
  • Voice of the Voiceless.
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2010, 03:49:14 AM »
Will it really happen??

No :tear:

Got interrupted :(

The Bret Hart I knew was a legendary wrestler. The Bret Hart of today is simply awful. Hart's in-ring appearance is tragic, his acting is awful, and his wrestling, well I wouldn't even call it wrestling. Give up man, you're just ruining the "Hitman's" proud legacy with this pathetic gimmick.

He's had 2 strokes and is in his mid 50's, give him a break. Nobody with those conditiond would even think of getting back in the ring. But the thought of two of the most legendary wrestler's ever fighting was an amazing feeling.

first time I watch RAW in months... it's really gotten bad :fpalm:

Blame PG and bad booking. :smirk:


This was the first thing I've been excited for in months

Roses are red
Violets are blue
Fuck you, whore.

Johan is not nuts. At least not anymore nuts than the rest of us. He is ruled by his own psychology, which includes jealousy that he cannot sing that high.

ThorThunderz

  • Beatin' A Dead Horse
  • **
  • Posts: 170
  • Gender: Male
  • I got a molotov cocktail too!
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2010, 05:52:38 PM »
The Bret Hart I knew was a legendary wrestler. The Bret Hart of today is simply awful. Hart's in-ring appearance is tragic, his acting is awful, and his wrestling, well I wouldn't even call it wrestling. Give up man, you're just ruining the "Hitman's" proud legacy with this pathetic gimmick.
Like the poster above stated, He had two strokes and is in his mid fifties. He doesn't wrestle on RAW he is just
an appearance maker for a big storyline, which is one of the best in the last 8 years. I watched it and they didn't wrestle. The new faction called neXus came in and destroyed the undertaker or some shit which was awesome.
WWE has been shitty but it's a cycle company. right now they are doing PG again in the eighties and early ninties it was PG you know why? Because they nuture the newer audiences and when they get older, they take more risks.
Attitude era only lasted about... 3-6 years at most. then they started to settle it down a bit more.
I don't mind watching it still to be honest. They just need to stop being lazy with booking and make some storylines
that don't involve the world title and what not.
You should have a warning for peeps with epilepsy under your avatar...that'll drop a bitch.  :O

Euterpe

  • Very Old At Heart
  • ******
  • Posts: 18723
  • Gender: Female
  • Voice of the Voiceless.
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2010, 01:42:53 AM »
Like the poster above stated, He had two strokes and is in his mid fifties. He doesn't wrestle on RAW he is just
an appearance maker for a big storyline, which is one of the best in the last 8 years. I watched it and they didn't wrestle. The new faction called neXus came in and destroyed the undertaker or some shit which was awesome.
WWE has been shitty but it's a cycle company. right now they are doing PG again in the eighties and early ninties it was PG you know why? Because they nuture the newer audiences and when they get older, they take more risks.
Attitude era only lasted about... 3-6 years at most. then they started to settle it down a bit more.
I don't mind watching it still to be honest. They just need to stop being lazy with booking and make some storylines
that don't involve the world title and what not
.

 :nod:

They need to show the little twerps real wrestling. The TV-14 rated Attitude Era was what I watched. I was simply amazed. Which I think kids or new fans would really appreciate what pro wrestling is all about when they see stuff like that. How people, including Bret Hart, put their bodies, and in some sitiuations, their lives on the line.
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Fuck you, whore.

Johan is not nuts. At least not anymore nuts than the rest of us. He is ruled by his own psychology, which includes jealousy that he cannot sing that high.

ThorThunderz

  • Beatin' A Dead Horse
  • **
  • Posts: 170
  • Gender: Male
  • I got a molotov cocktail too!
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2010, 03:06:25 AM »
Exactly, damn I wish we could go back up a rating and get some edgier shit going. Because right now it's the same old thing over and over again. JOHN CENA WINS THE PPV MATCH... JOHN CENA LOSES ON TV... JOHN CENA WINS THE PPV MATCH WHICH MEANS EVERYTHING... fuck John Cena, I know a dude has got to live, but man he had a better chance at becoming a rapper than some stale gimmicked overrated character.
You should have a warning for peeps with epilepsy under your avatar...that'll drop a bitch.  :O

Euterpe

  • Very Old At Heart
  • ******
  • Posts: 18723
  • Gender: Female
  • Voice of the Voiceless.
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2010, 12:10:35 PM »
No doubt. It would for sure get some life back into pro wrestling. Exactly! I'm so sick and tired of Cena winning and losing and being champion so much. It's like a broken record. He needs to go or turn heel to get some life back into his career. He's going to be exactly like Hogan, which isn't always a good thing. I agree. Which is why I think they need to bring back the Dr. of Thuganomics
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Fuck you, whore.

Johan is not nuts. At least not anymore nuts than the rest of us. He is ruled by his own psychology, which includes jealousy that he cannot sing that high.

abaraxas

  • Very Old At Heart
  • ******
  • Posts: 16765
  • Arch Faggot
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #9 on: September 03, 2010, 02:46:43 PM »
:nod:

They need to show the little twerps real wrestling. The TV-14 rated Attitude Era was what I watched. I was simply amazed. Which I think kids or new fans would really appreciate what pro wrestling is all about when they see stuff like that. How people, including Bret Hart, put their bodies, and in some sitiuations, their lives on the line.

I havent watched wrestling since 99 or so-seems like there isnt a whole lot of wrestling going on nowadays just bullshit and chicks in bikinis.

Back in my day (lol)

I hate John Cena, whoever the fuck-these new guys have no personality when the guys who made the WWF etc so huge back in the 80s and 90s (still on these shows but in a limited capacity) are all dead or just too old to even show up to mouth off I wonder who will give a fuck.
Humanary Stew

The Spaghetti Incident?

  • NewGNR Crew!
  • Very Old At Heart
  • *****
  • Posts: 16255
  • Gender: Male
  • All those wasted hours we used to know..
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #10 on: September 03, 2010, 03:12:18 PM »
Yeah, pretty much. I saw Golddust on YT the other day fighting Seamus and it was the only time in recent memory I've enjoyed it :lol:

Undertaker and HHH fights aside.

abaraxas

  • Very Old At Heart
  • ******
  • Posts: 16765
  • Arch Faggot
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #11 on: September 03, 2010, 03:15:39 PM »
Goldust  :bow:

Dusty Rhodes is/was the epitomy of a wrestler IMO-fat, wore underpants and kneepads-you know what I mean  :paranoid:

Humanary Stew

rds.06

  • Gets More Pussy Than Mick Wall
  • *****
  • Posts: 6150
  • Gender: Male
  • "I'm Melting"
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2010, 04:28:52 PM »
Is it still the same undertaker that was around back in the day?

I used to love that fucker  :lol:

Along with Jake the Snake Roberts & the Legion of Doom.
clean your ears...Nickelback's guitar work is awesome.

The Spaghetti Incident?

  • NewGNR Crew!
  • Very Old At Heart
  • *****
  • Posts: 16255
  • Gender: Male
  • All those wasted hours we used to know..
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #13 on: September 03, 2010, 04:47:31 PM »
Yeah, and he still fucking rocks.

But it's weird ya know, having Undertaker and Kane that are supposed to be these like demonic assholes, and for some reason they're the only "super natural" wrestlers in the league. Seems like they should have dropped that angle after WWF became the WWE. Think I read Undertaker absolutely can't stand being the Undertaker and regrets the persona.

Euterpe

  • Very Old At Heart
  • ******
  • Posts: 18723
  • Gender: Female
  • Voice of the Voiceless.
Re: Hitman vs Undertaker
« Reply #14 on: September 08, 2010, 03:32:50 AM »
I havent watched wrestling since 99 or so-seems like there isnt a whole lot of wrestling going on nowadays just bullshit and chicks in bikinis.

Back in my day (lol)

I hate John Cena, whoever the fuck-these new guys have no personality when the guys who made the WWF etc so huge back in the 80s and 90s (still on these shows but in a limited capacity) are all dead or just too old to even show up to mouth off I wonder who will give a fuck.

True that. Which sucks because wrestlers who have potential to be very talented are being pushed in the wrong way. Wrestling in 99 was awesome. It went sour in about 2004-05.

Oldie :giggle:

I don't like him either. There's a few I like now. They'll never reach the popularity of the Attitude era did. The guys now would shit their pants if they had to go up against those guys in their hayday.

Yeah, pretty much. I saw Golddust on YT the other day fighting Seamus and it was the only time in recent memory I've enjoyed it :lol:

Undertaker and HHH fights aside.

HHH is now some executive guy or something now and Taker is in bad shape at the moment, so that will automattically make wrestling dull.

Is it still the same undertaker that was around back in the day?

I used to love that fucker  :lol:

Along with Jake the Snake Roberts & the Legion of Doom.


Yeah! He's amazing even though he isn't in the best shape anymore. Still out-performs all the new guys.

LOD!! :banana

Yeah, and he still fucking rocks.

But it's weird ya know, having Undertaker and Kane that are supposed to be these like demonic assholes, and for some reason they're the only "super natural" wrestlers in the league. Seems like they should have dropped that angle after WWF became the WWE. Think I read Undertaker absolutely can't stand being the Undertaker and regrets the persona.

 :nod:

Yeah I know. And they have a huge fanbase. When they're supposed to be the bad guys :lol:
I think they lost the super natural feel of those two way back, which kinda sucks because it was cool to watch. I liked him the most when he was the American Badass/Big Evil :bow:
And Kane made a good, funny, face
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Fuck you, whore.

Johan is not nuts. At least not anymore nuts than the rest of us. He is ruled by his own psychology, which includes jealousy that he cannot sing that high.