Again, you say things as if WC´s only purpose was to fight deliberately which isn´t true. If I´m not wrong, someone complained because WC and this Dave guy and some more were discussing whether CD was overproduced and all that stuff, and someone said that WC should start his own thread to discuss that...etc, and he did it so where´s the problem?
Except, his purpose was only to fight, which would be quite clearly obvious to you if only you could take an objective view of him. As I showed in this thread:
http://www.newgnr.com/forum/index.php?topic=39030.0I also said there should be a thread for production, in the CD section (it's hardly news), but that's not what bothered me with that thread. The fact is that W/C made the thread, dave posted his opinion on the topic, which I didn't agree with, but atleast he wrote it civily and responded to W/C's comments, only for W/C to bash him and start the name calling. So, to your question, that's where the problem is.
Yes, you offend when you talk too so before accusing others pay attention to what you say first. Are you going to deny that calling someone a mindless cronie is not offensive or said with contempt? And again, I didn´t jump on you, I quoted your post because I didn´t agree with what you said and because I wanted to defend my friend. Hell! the way you say it sounds as if I was obsessed with you 
For the record; I have never treated you with contempt. I have never once spoken about you as though you were retarded, which W/C has done to people, and the closest I've come to 'name-calling', (feel free to prove me wrong If I've missed something) is just now when I called you a "mindless cronie". maybe "mindless" was unneccesary, but I can live with it knowing that I've treated you with a lot more respect than you've shown me. However, you show all the traits of a "crony". As far as I can tell, (again, feel free to prove me wrong), you've never once criticised W/C's behaviour, and yet jump on others for much less. Far from treating you with contenpt, I've always tried to respond to your comments, rather than cherry picking individual remarks as others do.
Incidentally, I never claimed, or made it sound, like you were obsessed with me, I just stated the facts. As it happens, of the two of us, I'm the only one whose ever been labelled a "stalker" and a "troll", though not neccesarily by you.
Are you going to tell me that this isn´t true? You can´t stand Warchild and you go attack him even if you are not involved in the conversation. Oh, yes, I forgot you are the almighty incarnation of just and you will call WC out in the name of justice
Do I jump on him in every thread? No. Check most of his vacuous threads. I don't say anything. I 'attack' him when he's treating other users like shit. Have you a problem with that? And as for the second sentance of that post, it's almost so pathetic I don't know why I'm bothering to respond to it. I will try, however. When have I made any comment that even remotely ties in with what you are saying? I quite openly don't like the way W/C treats people, and I generally say something if I see it, as I would in everyday life. Last time I checked, it's not a crime, or even particulary unsociable, to make a critique of someone's behaviour. Much like you do to me.
It´s a pitty you mistake true friendship and loyalty with "gang mentality". Oh, and I guess supporting the band 100% is a crime, and I also guess that we are ruining the forum because we suppport our favourite band and because we speak our minds...maybe that´s worse than polluting the forum with bullshit, or imposing opinions as fact, or spend all the time in here calling each other faggot.
I'm friends with other users on the forum, such as RoseHudson, Pawnshop, Abaraxas, and others, even Farid, to an extent (you know I love ya Farid
). I don't jump on users if they have a disagreement with one of those users, only if they are treating them like shit. That is the difference. Also, when have I critisiced the band? I haven't. Gn'R are my favourite band as well (with Zeppelin), so trying to turn this into an issue about 'haters' vs 'supporter's is pathetic. It's an issue of civility. I speak my mind too, but in the news section I try to be respectful, unless someone has allready started an argument, even if it's not neccesarily with me. "Polluting the forum with bullshit"?. It's not me that's been turning otherwise amicable threads into arguments, that's W/C, as in the thread I posted above. Also, i don't impose my opinion as fact, that's one of W/C's choice traits. And the faggot comment's are kept soley to the flamer section. Seems to me that, if you were to take an objective view, you'd realise that you just critisiced W/C's entire character.
I wasn´t being arrogant, the way you talked to me sounded like I had nothing better to do than go after you when what happened was just that I was online at that moment and saw your post.It was a mere chance and you acted all scandalized like " I posted and less than 2 mins she...bla bla bla". And again, I have more important things to do than go after you " in less than 2 minutes" 
I was just stating fact's, I posted, and within 2 minutes, you had jumped on me for it, as has happened countless times before. And as I said before, it wasn't true arrogance, if only because you're incapable of pulling it off (take that one as a compliment).
